I was having a hard time getting the feel for group one they had some things that really caught my ear and I made it a point to note those thing in my Primary Pad posts but to no avail the system went haywire on me today. However I do have a couple of written notes and have capture some of the things that caught my attention. Table 1 was having a discussion about a stick hitting a puck. The first lady says There is contact ... let go... then contact at its midline position. this is the way I see it based on my logic. the other lady replies I agree with what you are saying. Then the first lady chimes back in and asks of her table mates if her logic is logical! I liked the fact that she questioned her own train of thought even though her table mates agreed with her  initial statement. This then lead into a deeper discussion about what happen ed from the beginning to the end. However at one point they decided that they did not have enough proof to determine if their initial thought process was the right model.