After some initial discussion about representing positive and negative potential energy, Lisa stood up, came to the front of the room and drew the same potential energy graph, but below the x-axis. Next came a very very long whole class discussion about the differences of representing the physics in negative or positive potential energy (whether it be gravitational potential energy or magnetic potential energy). Since I was taking field notes, and was trying to write down what happened in the whole classroom, as well as what happened in the group that I was observing, I couldn't really follow the detailed contents of the discussion. But I realized that the teachers took over the classroom. They really wanted to talk about that. A few people were slamming arguments around other people's heads, it was really fascinating. But the most fascinating thing that I noticed (in light of me still analyzing Monday's ET episode) was Hunter, quietly walking to the back of the room, at some point, completely holding himself back, even having his hand near his mouth (as if to actively prevent himself from speaking). It was just so amazing to see how the classroom was managing itself without an instructor having to intervene somehow. At some very late stage in the discussion, Hunter helped mediate the discussion when there was a gap, and the momentum of the discussion was gone. It was just one of those gorgeous moments where a classroom organized itself and the instructor just stepped back to let it happen. Very impressive...
Insights and updates from Interdisciplinary Research Institute in STEM Education (I-RISE) Scholars, directors, and collaborators
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Self-organizing classroom
On Leslie's notion of today being an incredible day, I would like to report a very exhausting (at least for me) 45 minute episode that happened this afternoon. Hunter was drawing a graph on the board, showing potential energy (the upper half in the picture below).

After some initial discussion about representing positive and negative potential energy, Lisa stood up, came to the front of the room and drew the same potential energy graph, but below the x-axis. Next came a very very long whole class discussion about the differences of representing the physics in negative or positive potential energy (whether it be gravitational potential energy or magnetic potential energy). Since I was taking field notes, and was trying to write down what happened in the whole classroom, as well as what happened in the group that I was observing, I couldn't really follow the detailed contents of the discussion. But I realized that the teachers took over the classroom. They really wanted to talk about that. A few people were slamming arguments around other people's heads, it was really fascinating. But the most fascinating thing that I noticed (in light of me still analyzing Monday's ET episode) was Hunter, quietly walking to the back of the room, at some point, completely holding himself back, even having his hand near his mouth (as if to actively prevent himself from speaking). It was just so amazing to see how the classroom was managing itself without an instructor having to intervene somehow. At some very late stage in the discussion, Hunter helped mediate the discussion when there was a gap, and the momentum of the discussion was gone. It was just one of those gorgeous moments where a classroom organized itself and the instructor just stepped back to let it happen. Very impressive...
After some initial discussion about representing positive and negative potential energy, Lisa stood up, came to the front of the room and drew the same potential energy graph, but below the x-axis. Next came a very very long whole class discussion about the differences of representing the physics in negative or positive potential energy (whether it be gravitational potential energy or magnetic potential energy). Since I was taking field notes, and was trying to write down what happened in the whole classroom, as well as what happened in the group that I was observing, I couldn't really follow the detailed contents of the discussion. But I realized that the teachers took over the classroom. They really wanted to talk about that. A few people were slamming arguments around other people's heads, it was really fascinating. But the most fascinating thing that I noticed (in light of me still analyzing Monday's ET episode) was Hunter, quietly walking to the back of the room, at some point, completely holding himself back, even having his hand near his mouth (as if to actively prevent himself from speaking). It was just so amazing to see how the classroom was managing itself without an instructor having to intervene somehow. At some very late stage in the discussion, Hunter helped mediate the discussion when there was a gap, and the momentum of the discussion was gone. It was just one of those gorgeous moments where a classroom organized itself and the instructor just stepped back to let it happen. Very impressive...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am sure in my bones that there are critical things that happened during that messy stuff on the first day that made what you describe possible. Something was getting established then, and it was not stable yet and we didn't at all know if it was working, and I think now we have evidence that it was. What can we see on the first day that laid the groundwork? (If you agree with me about that.)
ReplyDeleteRachel, I agree with you that something happened before today that made today happen. I don't know what that was or when it happened. But it surely would be worthwhile investigating...
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to note that one group has a finite minimum energy and one group looks like it has infinite minimum energy. No?
ReplyDeleteI mean, you said "the same potential energy graph, but below the x-axis" - but it looks like one is a 1/r and one is not. From my converastions with Lezlie and Linda their assumption was the same graph, displaced. But was that was Lisa & Matt thought, too?
ReplyDeleteThat is indeed a very good question, Leslie. I don't know what Lisa & Matt were thinking, and they didn't tell us. Maybe Rachel has a theory about that?
ReplyDeleteAnd, actually, I'm not sure if Lisa and Matt did spend much thought on what the graphs actually mean, or if they just wanted to emphasize negative instead of positive. But I don't know... Should we ask them as long as they're still here? Maybe next week, when the heat of the discussion yesterday has cooled off?
ReplyDelete