Not only is this full of fantastic stuff about chemical energy, Heather (?) says at the end that she is coming to believe that there's not different types of energy but that energy is a pure substance (that undergoes transformation). The teachers seem to think this is deep...and cool. What's really cool about this to me is that this is the kind of stuff that seems to be under debate (at the meta level) in the scientific community.
Insights and updates from Interdisciplinary Research Institute in STEM Education (I-RISE) Scholars, directors, and collaborators
Monday, November 14, 2011
For Emily: Chemical Energy
I'm tagging things that seem relevant to Emily Moore, a postdoc at CU Boulder whose background is in chemistry, as I process data for myself. I was looking for a particular episode and came across this gem from 2011 UE1 (entitled UE1 110630 1030 heather):
Not only is this full of fantastic stuff about chemical energy, Heather (?) says at the end that she is coming to believe that there's not different types of energy but that energy is a pure substance (that undergoes transformation). The teachers seem to think this is deep...and cool. What's really cool about this to me is that this is the kind of stuff that seems to be under debate (at the meta level) in the scientific community.
Not only is this full of fantastic stuff about chemical energy, Heather (?) says at the end that she is coming to believe that there's not different types of energy but that energy is a pure substance (that undergoes transformation). The teachers seem to think this is deep...and cool. What's really cool about this to me is that this is the kind of stuff that seems to be under debate (at the meta level) in the scientific community.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment